Integrated fashion logistics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3500 words

Integrated fashion logistics - Essay Example As far as the retail business was concerned the key indicator of sales success was the proportion of 'full price sales' achieved by the company, as opposed to garments being sold at a discount during the 'sales' period. Such discounts on garments offered on end of season sales may go even up to 50% of the prices depending on the style and demand for particular garments. There are several logistical models available to help speeding up the supply chain management and thereby improve the profitability of the company. This paper attempts to discuss some the models such as Quick Response (QR), Fast Fashion and Mass Customisation, which help in improving the efficiency of the supply chain management. The study also analyses the relationship between these models and the relative merits and demerits of the respective models available to the organisation employing these models. "More than ever before speed has become a source of competitive advantage. Competing on speed requires an organisation characterised by fast moves, fast adaptations and tight linkages. .. Forming alliances is one of the most effective avenues for competing speed. The best example is the textile industry's quick response initiative, designed to improve the flow of information, standardise recording systems, and reduce turnaround time along the entire supply chain from fiber to textiles to apparel to retailing." - Roberta S. Russell, Bernard W. Taylor Operation Management: Edition IV (2003). pp 37. Quick Response (known shortly as QR) is best suited to Fashion Retail Industry. This is due to the following factors: Seasonality - This is the main factor which necessitates the speed in the supply chain of fashion retailers. Products are made according to a predetermined standard size and there is no time to revise the outfits once manufactured. Pricing - Especially with the seasonality factor, garments which have note reached in time to the retail store may have to be sold at heavily discounted prices. Excessive lead time due to the fashion collections being prepared by the designers considerably before the time the garment reaches the retail stores put an element of distortion in sales due to faulty or unacceptable designs. "Few industries are as notorious as the apparel industry for having such difficulty predicting demand," observed by Marion Bragger (2004) 2.1 METHOD OF OPERATION OF QUICK RESPONSE: The essential features of the Quick Response method are outlined below: By convincing a potential and dependent supplier of garments, the manufacturing facility may be split into, some capacity doing production in normal way and a certain minimal part of the production capacity can be converted into following the QR approach. The management of the factory should have a meeting with the workers to educate them on the necessity and operation methods of the QR system, so that any initial resistance from the workers side may be controlled. The next step is to form the QR teams with workers selected from the existing workers either by the management or voluntary QR teams can be

CRIMINAL LAW - HOMISIDE Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

CRIMINAL LAW - HOMISIDE - Assignment Example 23). With reference to the above given question, this paper will determine the accuracy and the type of homicide that was involved in the two cases given. In addition to that, this paper will identify the relevant points that will be able to prove that the offences that were committed were committed by the said parties. This paper will also cite correctly the legal authorities and scholarly opinions which support or refute those arguments. In the case study given above, Peter committed the act of hiding behind the fence in Quinn’s field with the intention of startling the horses and riders but instead, the act led to the death of Quinn who fell from a horse which was startled by Peter. At the same time, Derek and Cedric who were hunting together with Quinn, picked up Peter, carried him out of the field and threw him into a lake. As a result, there were two murders, that is, that of Quinn who was killed unintentionally by Peter and that of Peter who was killed intentionally by Cedric and Derek. In the first case where Quinn was killed by Peter, that kind of murder is known as involuntary manslaughter according to the English legal system. ... This act can also be put in the category of manslaughter by gross negligence. This is where one ignores all the risks involved in the act and goes ahead to commit it which later leads to the death of another human being. In this case, Peter had foreseen that there was a possibility of a rider falling from a horse as he startled it but ignored the fact and went ahead to commit the act which in turn led to the death of Quinn. There are four stages of gross negligence known as Adomako test that was presented by the House of Lords in the United Kingdom (Slapper & Kelly 2011). The Adomako test involves stages which are; a duty of care of existence to the deceased. This is a stage which arises when; a person commits an act without being reasonable or being able to foresee the results of his / her actions because some the acts may lead to death. In this case study Peter was not reasonable when he committed the act of startling the horses knowing very well that this act may cause injury or h arm to another person but instead caused death to Quinn. If Peter had the duty of care to the other human beings, he would have foreseen the results of his actions and would have been able to foretell what would have happened if he continues with his intentions. In this case, Peter foresaw the results of his action and was not reasonable enough to know that his actions can cause injury or even murder to a fellow human being. Therefore, there was a breach of the duty of care by Peter towards Quinn. A breach of the duty of care is where a person may not be able to act as a reasonable person would have in their possession (Wheeler 2002, p. 42). In this case, Peter did not act as a reasonable person would have acted in his position and