Legal Handbook Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Legal Handbook - Essay Examplee district of azimuth and the Cartwright School dominion 83 in Phoenix is to ensure that the learning of students is the primary focus of the their professional time. Secondly, the legislature stipulates that it is the responsibilities of the teachers to hold their students to strict account for any inappropriate behaviour. Thirdly, the polity requires teachers to record and maintain the attendance records for students on a daily basis. Fifthly, the legislation delegates to teachers, the responsibility of making the decision as to whether to allow a student to hold out to the next grade in the aspect of a common school or to issue a pass or fail to the student in the case of a course in high school. However, decisions in this regard can be overturned by the procedures stipulated in section 15-342 under the Arizona state legislature. Lastly, the legislation stipulates that teachers ca-ca a duty to comply with all the rules and policies that have bee n developed by a schools governing personify (Arizona State Legislature). The case of Spanierman versus Hughes was a federal salute case in 2008 whereby Spanierman who was a teacher at the Emmett O Brien High School in computed axial tomography failed to overturn the decision by the school board not to renew her contract because of engaging in actions that are disruptive to school activities via her MySpace page (Neuburger, 2008). This case law affirm the fact that the failure of teachers to abide by the rules and policies can lead to detrimental consequences such as dismissal from work. According to Osborne and Russo (2011), teachers enjoy current rights that include right to receive notice of marginination and even right to a fair hearing when an issue arise. Secondly, under the bill of rights in the basic amendment teachers have been... This essay stresses that the law in Arizona and in the Cartwright School District 83 in Phoenix limit the content or the field of force th at teachers can teach and/ or discuss in the class. The law stipulates that teachers should only present to the class contents that are relevant and even consistent with the responsibilities that have been stipulated for teachers and they should avoid introducing topics or subjects that have political or personal agendas in the classrooms. This paper declares that while deciding a case against academic freedom the court of law would normally take into consideration the experience, the grade level and even the age of the students involved in the case. In the case law Hardy versus the Jefferson familiarity College, 260 F.3d 671, the contract of a professor was not renewed because of a complain that was filed by an African American student who was protesting the professors use of the term nigger and bitch in the classroom. The introduction of such topics or discussions by the professor was a violation of academic freedom. The law in Arizona and in the Cartwright School District 83 in Phoenix accords teachers the right to freedom of association of which under the national constitution it is the first amendments, which accords the citizens of the state the right to placid assembly. The right to freedom of association therefore allows public school teachers in the Cartwright School District 83 in Phoenix to join any roil or professional organization of their own choice, run for an elective public office, and even form association of their liking or profession.